American Thought Leaders Interview
American Thought Leaders Interview
My recent two-part interview with Jan Jekielek on vaccine mandates, my situation at the University, public health policy, and the threat of a biosecurity surveillance regime
In my opinion, this is the best and most comprehensive interview I’ve done yet on these issues. I’m grateful to Jan Jekielek for giving this topic “room to breathe” and allowing the necessary time to unpack things in some depth. He restored my faith that there are still good, responsible journalists out there who want to get the full story.
Part 1:
In this two-part interview, we discuss the rise of what Dr. Kheriaty describes as medical coercion, perverse incentives in the vaccine rollout, and why he thinks the overwhelming majority of vaccine mandates exclude natural immunity.
Part 2:
Now in part two, we discuss perverse incentives involved in the vaccine rollout, the ethics of testing COVID-19 vaccines on children, and the rise of what he calls “biosecurity surveillance.”
If you’re not yet familiar with this program, American Thought Leaders, I highly recommend Jan’s interviews on relevant Covid topics with my friends Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford (here and here), Martin Kulldorff of Harvard (here and here), Scott Atlas (here), and Robert Malone (here, here, and here).
Enjoy!
Dear Dr. Kheriaty,
Just watched this interview and hat off! Your composed, focused and yet natural way of presenting all sort of angles to complex medical subjects is simply world class. I can see already that some people will ask exactly the question already raised by someone else. However, as I have experienced already myself, and others confirmed for me too, throwing as many hard facts in as short a time frame in a ‘believers’ face, will not accomplish anything, other than a negative reaction. The only thing we can do is to raise questions, raise doubt after doubt until people start to switch off their internal ‘safety switch’ of… “It is ok because I am going with the majority here”, and start engaging their own critical mind and really start asking themselves questions more and more until they are actually receptive to a different opinion and then the actual facts! Only then can we hope to stem the tide of mindless group think which enables this madness to develop in the first place.
Thank you for the stand you take! I wish more medical professionals would stand up and say no more! It is precisely the reason I support you with my monthly subscription to help in my very own small way what you do for all of us, worldwide, I might add!
Sir,
Just watched the second part. Maybe because of your current vulnerability you are restraining yourself or maybe you gave us the whole story tonight. Yet I wonder why you didn't mention ivermectin and other early early home treatments. Maybe that was a hill that for you was not worth dying over. But I keep wondering when our health care professionals and political leaders are going to tell the truth that the vaccines were ill conceived, have killed and injured many more than reported on VAERs, and are increasing case counts and deaths. Here is my latest blogpost which I will try (and probably) fail to present to our local board of supervisors and public health officials. It is a simple solution that would make the pandemic go away as it has in a province in India if those in charge wanted it to. I admire your principled stand and your courage to talk about it. Just wish you had gone further. As I state in this post, vaccines no longer serve a purpose, not just in your case, but in everyone's case. It is the vaccinated we need to worry about, not the unvaccinated. https://beyondmentalillness.com/category/daves-blog/