Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Carl Eric Scott's avatar

Hannah Arendt thought so. The "conservatives" we ally ourselves with don't. https://dissidentcon.substack.com/p/reading-eichmann-in-2020s-america

Expand full comment
Taming the Wolf Institute's avatar

Oh, my. I made it up to the discussion of the Book of Job... and that is where the theology falls and flops around like a dying fish. In the Book of Job, God allows Satan to torture Job. At that point, one has to stop abruptly and ask, "What kind of God is this?" Not one that we can really honor; rather, a pretty pathetic God. And that typifies the OT. Not the God we worship in the NT. How do we know? Because Jesus argued that point before the Sadducees. Jesus presented a valid theology. The Sadducees insisted on the OT theology, declared Jesus a blasphemer, and sentenced him to crucifixion, the penalty for blasphemy. We need to know the failure of the OT and its barbaric God, its false God, sure. But we do not need to soil NT theology, the theology that Jesus presented, the theology that is Christian, by entering in the very theological fallacies that brought about the suffering and crucifixion of Jesus. Those who continue to blindly celebrate the false God that resulted in the death of Jesus just do not get Christianity. I do not mean to be unkind, but you really do need to acquire a deeper theological background before tackling these difficult topics.

Expand full comment

No posts