Human Flourishing

Share this post

Letter of Support from UCLA Professor

aaronkheriaty.substack.com

Letter of Support from UCLA Professor

You learn who your friends are when you go through difficult times.

Aaron Kheriaty, MD
Mar 21, 2022
332
19
Share this post

Letter of Support from UCLA Professor

aaronkheriaty.substack.com

It’s been instructive to see which colleagues from the University of California have (or have not) reached out to support or encourage me since I was fired. Some old friends have disappointed while others have surprised me—including some new friends I had not previously known while at the University. Recently, a professor of English at UCLA sent this unsolicited letter to the UCI Chancellor. I am publishing his extraordinary letter here with his permission:

Dear Chancellor Gillman:

I am reaching out to you as a member of the academic community of which you are a leader. I am sure you have already received letters on behalf of Dr. Aaron Kheriaty from those who knew him in person or worked with him at the University of California, Irvine.

Although I have neither worked nor met with Dr. Kheriaty, I have profited tremendously not only from his academic work on bioethics but also from his current public-facing writings on informed consent and bio-surveillance (and will be teaching one of his essays in the Fall). But I am not writing to defend Dr. Kheriaty’s scholarship or the challenges that it offers to my own thinking about matters of life and death and, more generally, about the intersection of theory and practice. Rather, I am writing to speak for the public intellectual who quite literally practiced the bioethics that he had been teaching his students at our University for over 14 years until one Friday when he was fired. I can hardly overstate the fact that Dr. Kheriaty has impacted my own pedagogy in ways that few other teachers have. Like the legendary Socrates (whose philosophy I teach) or the Brazilian educator Paulo Freire (whose “pedagogy of the oppressed” informs my own), Dr. Kheriaty is the rare teacher who dared to exhibit the courage of informed conviction outside the classroom. Despite his firing, he continues to represent and inspire many others at our University who found themselves to be passive objects of communication rather than active subjects in communication on matters related to Covid protocols. 

Dr. Kheriaty not merely raised questions about vaccine-induced immunity and informed consent but also went so far as to challenge the University’s sweeping Covid-19 vaccine mandate that he among other academics had grave concerns about for both medical and ethical reasons. I am not claiming that we should all agree with his position. Far from it. I have followed the townhall talk that you hosted on May 19, 2021 on the question of the Covid vaccines and do understand the basis of your stated own positions on the matter. My point is less about embracing the rationale for a particular ethically and medically informed critique of the University’s Covid-19 policies than about engaging such a critique and allowing him a fair hearing, especially given that more and more scientists are now raising questions similar to those that he raised almost a year ago.

In my experience as an academic at UCLA and at my former universities (Yale and Fordham), scholars and students alike are not just allowed but also actively encouraged to discuss institutional policies and even challenge the administration about the ideas that inform them. (For the record, I continue to support and speak up for LGBTQ students as they all too often face institutional discrimination.) As I am sure you know, challenging official positions and policies (no matter how well-intentioned) is integral to the process of mutual learning and understanding – a view that UCI states far more eloquently on its own website (“true progress is made when different perspectives come together to advance our understanding of the world around us”).

The summary firing of Dr. Kheriaty, a full professor in the School of Medicine, has shaken me to the very core: not just me but also those who care deeply for our University’s commitment to academic freedom and the spirit of inquiry. I could not have imagined that any fellow faculty member, let alone one who has won several awards for excellence in teaching, could suddenly lose his job after years of outstanding service to our University.

Since his dismissal, I have felt the loss acutely in a manner not unlike grief but a grief that refuses to abate and that, in some ineffable way, has led to a deeper reflection on our University’s claims to due process and intellectual dissent. As a recently tenured professor of English at UCLA, I have had the honor to serve on executive and personnel committees. I have had the privilege to encounter sharp differences in judgment on matters that reasonable people can indeed disagree about. But no matter what difficult decisions we reached, those whom we judged and found wanting always had the opportunity to question our conclusions and, at the very least, receive a hearing. In short, dialogue and discussion were the means by which differences – even irreconcilable ones – were addressed and negotiated, not dismissed and suppressed.

I regret to say that Dr. Kheriaty’s firing strikes me as stemming from swift retaliation rather than calm reflection. While this is my personal view, it does impact our profession and undermines the collective vision of our University as a place where we can come together as a community of scholars willing to engage rather than expel dissent and, just as significantly, willing to debate rather than dismiss dissenting academics.

With both sadness and hope, I write to add my voice to appeal Dr. Kheriaty’s termination. I do so not just for the ways in which his scholarship continues to challenge my own thinking but also for the far-reaching implications it will have for our academic profession and indeed for teachers and scholars in a large public university system such as ours.

Please do not hesitate to contact me, if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Arvind Thomas, PhD.

Associate-Professor of English (Medieval Studies)

Department of English, 149 Kaplan Hall UCLA

However far the institutional corruption at our universities has progressed, I am nevertheless so grateful that there are still many good people like Professor Thomas in academia. Our students deserve no less. I do miss working with colleagues like him who are still dedicated to the highest ideals of the university.

19
Share this post

Letter of Support from UCLA Professor

aaronkheriaty.substack.com
19 Comments
Carrie Dodson
Mar 21, 2022·edited Mar 21, 2022

Thank you very much for sharing this update! It is nice to see a letter like this though I can't help but add that this man is quite late to rise to the occasion. Is this going to be the new virtue signaling we will see from people who were silent and in some cases even smug while their colleagues were ushered out the door??? It's pretty easy for him to do the right thing now when the embarrassing truth that he was dead wrong in his original position of accepting the injection is too obvious for anyone but the most deeply committed to their ignorance to see.

I am observing what is happening in my community now, completely flabbergasted that the people virtue signaling with gold and blue flags for strangers they have never met in another country are THE SAME people who said nothing while their colleagues, neighbors, family members - people they actually know - were unceremoniously and unlawfully terminated for committing the crime of acting with intelligence in declining an EXPERIMENTAL injection which NEVER, FROM DAY 1 HAD ANY LEGITIMATE LEGAL GROUNDS FOR USE IN HUMANS SINCE FROM DAY 1, THERAPEUTICS WERE AVAILABLE.

I have had enough of the pleas for reason and sanity. It is clear at this point that the decision makers behind these actions, including your termination, are CRIMINALS who conspired to participate in government sponsored democide. I am ready to see some trials and some consequences administered to the many guilty parties.

Expand full comment
ReplyGift a subscriptionCollapse
Data Humanist
Writes American Exile
Mar 21, 2022

The letter is both eloquent and well-argued. That the author is a Humanities professor strikes me as both good news and other news. Good: he and many, many others understand what is at stake. Other: too many academics in STEM and particularly Medicine are still keeping to their unofficial vow of silence. Open, honest discussion and debate would serve us all far better here. That said, I am thankful you received this formal letter of support. My best wishes for you and your family in these trying times.

Expand full comment
ReplyGift a subscriptionCollapse
17 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Aaron Kheriaty
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing