2 Comments

I'm not following how "Nowhere in these four situations is there any mention of a NATURALLY occurring epidemic, pandemic, or any other kind of public health situation that is not caused by 'biological, chemical, radiological or nuclear agent/s.'"

But there is no specification that it has to be natural or unnatural; if I find a bug on the ground and drop it in your coffee cup, it's a naturally occurring bug that was unnaturally placed in your coffee cup.

It just has to be a CBRN agent, affecting any US citizen living abroad: take your pick there are a million citizens abroad. Glad my government is so concerned for my welfare when I am in Mexico.

"Could SARS-CoV-2 qualify as such an agent?

If you look for the definition of 'biological agents' in the US Legal Code, you will go down the following pathway:

Crimes and Criminal Procedure -> Crimes -> Biological Weapons -> Definitions

So in the context of United States law, the term 'biological agents' means biological weapons, and the use of such agents/weapons is regarded as a crime.

Wikipedia provides this definition:

A biological agent (also called bio-agent, biological threat agent, biological warfare agent, biological weapon, or bioweapon) is a bacterium, virus, protozoan, parasite, fungus, or toxin that can be used purposefully as a weapon in bioterrorism or biological warfare (BW)."

I weaponized the bug when I dropped it into your coffee cup?

Is there an implication that the Secretary HHS would not declare a PHE to enable an EUA unless he knew, or thought he knew, that the putative virus was unnatural? That the 360bbb law is a reasonable law, and it was all a big mistake that the Secretary thought we were all going to die from an unnatural virus? Next time he'll measure twice, cut once?

Anyhow, look forward to the next post.

By the way, even if I lied about dropping that natural bug in your coffee cup... you might still feel sick, and you will probably throw out the coffee and get a fresh cup... if you're not feeling too sick to your stomach.

Expand full comment

I ain't no legal expert but to experiment on us with the "vaccine" that wasn't, they used all the necessary fancy words, like "cloture" or is it "clotting"? Anyway you can't sue for it. You can't sue the tobacco companies either cause the government made a deal and got the money.

Expand full comment