Thanks for your talk yesterday in Temecula. I agree that Missouri vs. Biden is the most important free speech lawsuit in American history. You said "if we prevail" it would be the most important free speech case. From my outsider's view, having read the amended suit which includes the mountains of documented evidence and direct interviews with government officials, it seems to me to be the most widespread, cataclysmic abuse of the first amendment I've witnessed in my lifetime. And the administration shows no sign of slowing down or even acknowledging that there's anything even in the gray zone. I think the public needs to be fully aware of it so we can voice our expectation that this lawsuit be given high visibility and that it is handled with the highest ethical standards. We, the public, need to make sure the judges and attorneys know ahead of time that the public is watching this carefully.
The proposal to separate analysis and policy departments is very important, since, as described above, the ability for the analysis - and potential policy development - section to research things properly, and to communicate this to the public and the policy section, is corrupted by the policy section favouring certain types of analysis and being fearful that the public won't be totally on board with their policies if certain aspects of analysis are widely known.
Corruption is like an infectious disease, cancer and fungus all at once. It is endemic to human nature and there is a constant battle to thwart it.
The personal payments of pharma patent royalties to government policy and analysis people is a real concern. Likewise the regulatory agencies' operating budgets coming partly or largely from the corporations they regulate.
With so much money at stake, these authorities are naturally targeted by extremely strongly motivated corporations and the natural outcome is corruption at massive cost to the public, mainly in terms of worse health. It is probably difficult to legislate and enforce, but something needs to be done about the pattern of regulatory staff doing favors for corporate interests and then leaving their posts for a lengthy, well paid, sojourn in the companies they used to regulate.
"Industry doesn't want to complain about it too much, but I think FDA is probably . . . I think they are using it to cover other expenses that don't necessarily tie in with the need of the user fees. I don't think there's enough people saying there [FDA]. "Look, that's fine but that's not right. So, we're not going to charge those [user fees]. You don't want to be that person. You're not going to have a long shelf-life in the agency [FDA] if you are always that person. . . . Well, you’ll be marked from getting other jobs because another office is not going to want to hire you if you’ve spoken out about something, right or wrong. . . . It's better just to stay quiet and accept it."
All of humanity is doomed as long as public health and regulatory agencies are swept along with the great preference among most medical professionals, the hospitals, the insurers (whose profits are regulated to a proportion of revenue, and so who want greater medical costs) and pharma companies for expensive, pseudo-sophisticated, solutions to perceived health problems in favour of better nutrition and other simpler, safer, more effective approaches.
This has led the entire industry to avoid recognising, decade after decade, that most people have only a fraction of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D their immune systems need to function properly. This is very easy to fix, but there is no profit in it. To do so would vastly improve human health and probably halve all medical interventions and expenses.
Please see the research articles cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ . All it takes, for 70 kg body weight without obesity, is 0.125 milligrams of vitamin D3 a day, on average. Every 7 to 10 days is fine. This is also known as the scarily high "5000 International Units" a day, but it is a gram every 22 years. Pharma grade vitamin D3 costs about USD$2.50 a gram, ex factory. Where's the profit in this? There's very little, compared to running humans into the ground and treating the vast array of diseases which result.
Individuals and governments should take much more interest in this. So this is the proper work of analysis and policy development, not spending billions of dollars trying to discover more drugs.
All of humanity needs about a tonne of vitamin D3 a day to attain the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D they need for their immune systems to mount full strength responses to cancer cells, bacteria, fungi and viruses, and to properly regulate potentially deadly hyper-inflammatory (indiscriminate cell destroying) immune responses. The ex-factory cost of this at current prices is about USD$1B a year.
Even ignoring COVID-19, influenza, and all other infectious and chronic diseases, we need to do this just to suppress the hyper-inflammatory condition of sepsis, which killed 11 million people in 2017: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)32989-7. This is a world war scale death toll, every day, every year - one person dying horribly every 3 seconds.
If you doubt the seriousness of all this, and the need for the authorities to understand the need for vitamin D3 supplementation, please read all the research cited at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .
Privately, I can put you in touch with a doctor and vitamin D researcher, with an impeccable record of care and achievement, who spent decades in the United States Public Health Service. He was never able to find a single department in all these organizations which was interested in vitamin D.
Appreciate your continued courage. Never let up until justice is done. UCLA committed a crime for which they will not likely be held to account, but you can win the bigger fight against the feds and make the point.
Thanks for your talk yesterday in Temecula. I agree that Missouri vs. Biden is the most important free speech lawsuit in American history. You said "if we prevail" it would be the most important free speech case. From my outsider's view, having read the amended suit which includes the mountains of documented evidence and direct interviews with government officials, it seems to me to be the most widespread, cataclysmic abuse of the first amendment I've witnessed in my lifetime. And the administration shows no sign of slowing down or even acknowledging that there's anything even in the gray zone. I think the public needs to be fully aware of it so we can voice our expectation that this lawsuit be given high visibility and that it is handled with the highest ethical standards. We, the public, need to make sure the judges and attorneys know ahead of time that the public is watching this carefully.
The proposal to separate analysis and policy departments is very important, since, as described above, the ability for the analysis - and potential policy development - section to research things properly, and to communicate this to the public and the policy section, is corrupted by the policy section favouring certain types of analysis and being fearful that the public won't be totally on board with their policies if certain aspects of analysis are widely known.
Ex CIA analyst Ray McGovern stated exactly the same principle regarding intelligence agencies in a fascinating interview a few days ago with Katie Halper and Aaron_Maté: https://usefulidiots.substack.com/p/ex-cia-agent-reveals-the-truth-about .
Corruption is like an infectious disease, cancer and fungus all at once. It is endemic to human nature and there is a constant battle to thwart it.
The personal payments of pharma patent royalties to government policy and analysis people is a real concern. Likewise the regulatory agencies' operating budgets coming partly or largely from the corporations they regulate.
With so much money at stake, these authorities are naturally targeted by extremely strongly motivated corporations and the natural outcome is corruption at massive cost to the public, mainly in terms of worse health. It is probably difficult to legislate and enforce, but something needs to be done about the pattern of regulatory staff doing favors for corporate interests and then leaving their posts for a lengthy, well paid, sojourn in the companies they used to regulate.
At https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/regulatory-capture-of-the-fda I transcribed some of Chris Cole's dinner date (with a Project Veritas undercover operative sweet-talker) masterclass on FDA corruption, including:
"Industry doesn't want to complain about it too much, but I think FDA is probably . . . I think they are using it to cover other expenses that don't necessarily tie in with the need of the user fees. I don't think there's enough people saying there [FDA]. "Look, that's fine but that's not right. So, we're not going to charge those [user fees]. You don't want to be that person. You're not going to have a long shelf-life in the agency [FDA] if you are always that person. . . . Well, you’ll be marked from getting other jobs because another office is not going to want to hire you if you’ve spoken out about something, right or wrong. . . . It's better just to stay quiet and accept it."
All of humanity is doomed as long as public health and regulatory agencies are swept along with the great preference among most medical professionals, the hospitals, the insurers (whose profits are regulated to a proportion of revenue, and so who want greater medical costs) and pharma companies for expensive, pseudo-sophisticated, solutions to perceived health problems in favour of better nutrition and other simpler, safer, more effective approaches.
This has led the entire industry to avoid recognising, decade after decade, that most people have only a fraction of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D their immune systems need to function properly. This is very easy to fix, but there is no profit in it. To do so would vastly improve human health and probably halve all medical interventions and expenses.
Please see the research articles cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ . All it takes, for 70 kg body weight without obesity, is 0.125 milligrams of vitamin D3 a day, on average. Every 7 to 10 days is fine. This is also known as the scarily high "5000 International Units" a day, but it is a gram every 22 years. Pharma grade vitamin D3 costs about USD$2.50 a gram, ex factory. Where's the profit in this? There's very little, compared to running humans into the ground and treating the vast array of diseases which result.
Individuals and governments should take much more interest in this. So this is the proper work of analysis and policy development, not spending billions of dollars trying to discover more drugs.
All of humanity needs about a tonne of vitamin D3 a day to attain the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D they need for their immune systems to mount full strength responses to cancer cells, bacteria, fungi and viruses, and to properly regulate potentially deadly hyper-inflammatory (indiscriminate cell destroying) immune responses. The ex-factory cost of this at current prices is about USD$1B a year.
Even ignoring COVID-19, influenza, and all other infectious and chronic diseases, we need to do this just to suppress the hyper-inflammatory condition of sepsis, which killed 11 million people in 2017: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)32989-7. This is a world war scale death toll, every day, every year - one person dying horribly every 3 seconds.
If you doubt the seriousness of all this, and the need for the authorities to understand the need for vitamin D3 supplementation, please read all the research cited at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .
Privately, I can put you in touch with a doctor and vitamin D researcher, with an impeccable record of care and achievement, who spent decades in the United States Public Health Service. He was never able to find a single department in all these organizations which was interested in vitamin D.
Thank you for your continued efforts! 💖🙏🏻
Appreciate your continued courage. Never let up until justice is done. UCLA committed a crime for which they will not likely be held to account, but you can win the bigger fight against the feds and make the point.