The district court combined our censorship case with a similar case filed by RFK Jr last year. Kennedy should be able to establish standing for another injunction against the government soon.
The COVID "vaccines" (that neither prevent disease nor transmission) were misrepresented to a massive group of human subjects. Consent was not fully informed, in part because of government-funded pressure on our sources of information. Even worse, the bowdlerized, incomplete story led a number of organizations to coerce human subjects to take the jab, even those with natural immunity, at ages and weights lacking substantial risk/potential benefit, or those who simply didn't want it. Coercion took many forms. The proof of vaccination card became a golden ticket and its absence justified various punishments and harms including, but not restricted to, expulsion from events and termination of employment. Denying "standing" to those harmed by censorship sets the stage for more violations of the Nuremberg Code, including more experiments without informed consent.
I learned recently that informed consent is actually only 30 years old in it's current form. The people doing regulation aren't experts normally, they are people who are largely dependent on institutional reward systems rather than independent thought for their own merit.
The real problem is the lack of independence between regulators and producers, i.e., the government is actually totally weak and has been for a very long time, because it does not in any way represent the will of the people. It represents the will of the capitalists, quite frankly.
That's not a political argument. It's just how the system works. Money isn't bad -- but capitalism (essentially the management of capital -- i.e., humans -- i.e., livestock) can't do anything other than see people as sheep. Until we address this, we ain't going nowhere.
I shared this article on Facebook and it was removed, but luckily I am fortunate enough to be a European citizen and be under the DSA which asserts my right to have a clear explanation for every moderation action... ahahah just kidding, there was no explanation, one could challenge the removal based on a series of pre-filled reasons, none of which were relevant, and then wait for an equally opaque and nonsensical 'review' of the removal. And that's it for the DSA, which all major Italian media assured was done primarily to protect transparency and freedom of expression..
Thanks for the update. So sorry the case is delayed, and hope the addition of the RFKjr case and your new discovery will give your case the findings it needs to meet the outrageously high standards for standing that the SC demands. Your case affects us all. We have to be sure there is narrative that counters the propaganda spewed by the government.
This is somewhat on a par with learning, years after it matters, that Hunter Biden's laptop is in fact, in the eyes of our government, Hunter Biden's laptop.
I am currently suffering an extreme and painful state (hyperbole intended) of cognitive dissonance. If anyone wants or can help me out, I'd appreciate it. With the FBI's role in social media censorship, I've had a mistrustful, dark, unflattering image of them. Then for the first time, I got to see the FBI director Mr. Wray being questioned at recent hearing regarding the shooter in Trump assassination attempt. I can't help but form the impression that he seems very trustworthy and honest. He seems to have a lot of integrity, impartiality, objectivity. I couldn't help but be impressed. BUT this does not square with a director of an organization that would go out of their way to violate the first amendment at the government's behest. So, now i'm going to watch the 10/31/23 and 4/11/24 representative hearings in which he is grilled to see if these shed light. Maybe it won't seem the same when it covers the covid censorship topic. If anyone has insight, please feel free to chime in. Cognitive dissonance is uncomfortable. LOL.
The COVID "vaccines" (that neither prevent disease nor transmission) were misrepresented to a massive group of human subjects. Consent was not fully informed, in part because of government-funded pressure on our sources of information. Even worse, the bowdlerized, incomplete story led a number of organizations to coerce human subjects to take the jab, even those with natural immunity, at ages and weights lacking substantial risk/potential benefit, or those who simply didn't want it. Coercion took many forms. The proof of vaccination card became a golden ticket and its absence justified various punishments and harms including, but not restricted to, expulsion from events and termination of employment. Denying "standing" to those harmed by censorship sets the stage for more violations of the Nuremberg Code, including more experiments without informed consent.
I learned recently that informed consent is actually only 30 years old in it's current form. The people doing regulation aren't experts normally, they are people who are largely dependent on institutional reward systems rather than independent thought for their own merit.
The real problem is the lack of independence between regulators and producers, i.e., the government is actually totally weak and has been for a very long time, because it does not in any way represent the will of the people. It represents the will of the capitalists, quite frankly.
That's not a political argument. It's just how the system works. Money isn't bad -- but capitalism (essentially the management of capital -- i.e., humans -- i.e., livestock) can't do anything other than see people as sheep. Until we address this, we ain't going nowhere.
I shared this article on Facebook and it was removed, but luckily I am fortunate enough to be a European citizen and be under the DSA which asserts my right to have a clear explanation for every moderation action... ahahah just kidding, there was no explanation, one could challenge the removal based on a series of pre-filled reasons, none of which were relevant, and then wait for an equally opaque and nonsensical 'review' of the removal. And that's it for the DSA, which all major Italian media assured was done primarily to protect transparency and freedom of expression..
Thanks for the update. So sorry the case is delayed, and hope the addition of the RFKjr case and your new discovery will give your case the findings it needs to meet the outrageously high standards for standing that the SC demands. Your case affects us all. We have to be sure there is narrative that counters the propaganda spewed by the government.
Let’s hope. From your pen to God’s ear.
Great News!! Badly needed in this current scathing desert.
This is somewhat on a par with learning, years after it matters, that Hunter Biden's laptop is in fact, in the eyes of our government, Hunter Biden's laptop.
Don't get co-opted.
https://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/05/nyregion/a-kennedy-and-his-mentor-part-ways-over-river-group.html
I am currently suffering an extreme and painful state (hyperbole intended) of cognitive dissonance. If anyone wants or can help me out, I'd appreciate it. With the FBI's role in social media censorship, I've had a mistrustful, dark, unflattering image of them. Then for the first time, I got to see the FBI director Mr. Wray being questioned at recent hearing regarding the shooter in Trump assassination attempt. I can't help but form the impression that he seems very trustworthy and honest. He seems to have a lot of integrity, impartiality, objectivity. I couldn't help but be impressed. BUT this does not square with a director of an organization that would go out of their way to violate the first amendment at the government's behest. So, now i'm going to watch the 10/31/23 and 4/11/24 representative hearings in which he is grilled to see if these shed light. Maybe it won't seem the same when it covers the covid censorship topic. If anyone has insight, please feel free to chime in. Cognitive dissonance is uncomfortable. LOL.