What a service Ms. Strong is providing here with excellent investigative journalism. How do we let the masses know? Mainstream media is beholden to (essentially owned by) Big Pharma.
I wonder what avenues other readers might suggest for getting this information in the hands of we the people - worldwide.
I am wondering why, after such detailed reporting in certain areas, you completely failed to report on a very important detail regarding the criteria for EUA approval by the FDA. You claim that people cannot sue the FDA for the EUA approval. I would challenge that claim and say people CAN and SHOULD be filing class action lawsuits against the FDA precisely for the fraud they perpetrated against the American people in their improper EUA approval.
Straight from the FDA website (https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization) it says, "Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), when the Secretary of HHS declares that an emergency use authorization is appropriate, FDA may authorize unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when certain criteria are met, INCLUDING THERE ARE NO ADEQUATE, APPROVED, AND AVAILABLE ALTERNATIVES." (Emphasis mine). The language here doesn't even say the alternatives have to be "safe and effective," (which they were) it simply says the alternatives have to be adequate, approved and available.
There were, in fact, not only "adequate" but also effective off label drugs with decades of safety data available to treat the public for COVID 19. These drugs proved quite "available" and were openly employed with great success in other countries. Even in this country these off label use drugs were used by our government to treat immigrants being illegally ushered into our country.
I'd argue that use of medications by our government to treat COVID in immigrant populations signifies "approval."
In short, our government willfully withheld lifesaving medicines from the American citizenry, directly causing a healthcare crisis in our nation along with considerable suffering and death, while providing these "adequate" and "approved" drugs, at the expense of American taxpayers who were denied access to them, to foreigners. And these foreigners were not in receipt of any second class treatment or medical care. The drugs that the FDA deemed "adequate" and "approved" enough for them were also deemed "adequate" and "approved" to treat the then President of the United States.
I'd say the case is very strong that the drugs which were "adequte, approved and available" for an American President and for illegal immigrants - who are presently an elevated and protected class of people in the United States - would also qualify as "adequate, approved and available alternatives" that should have been distributed broadly to the American citizenry, the American public. The moment that there were adequate, approved and available alternatives, which occurred before the fraudulently mislabeled "vaccines" ever rolled out for public distribution, legality of the FDA issued EUA was negated.
Fraud vitiates all contracts. The FDA and all the others mentioned in this publication engaged in deliberate and willful fraud including the fraudulent approval of EUA for the COVID injections. People should not be discouraged from filing and then winning class action lawsuits against the FDA both for approving EUA in the first place and for the fraud that continues each day they have kept the EUA in place.
8% of human DNA is viral in origin and some of the proteins that they code for are beneficial to human existence. Vaccines may be negatively impacting our overall place in the universe. Not to mention, they may be contributing to the inheritance of non-beneficial genes which simply leads to more medical interventions in the future. Nature’s “survival of the fittest” already has the public’s health, at the expense of the individual, naturally built into the system of evolution.
What a service Ms. Strong is providing here with excellent investigative journalism. How do we let the masses know? Mainstream media is beholden to (essentially owned by) Big Pharma.
I wonder what avenues other readers might suggest for getting this information in the hands of we the people - worldwide.
Great research.
I am wondering why, after such detailed reporting in certain areas, you completely failed to report on a very important detail regarding the criteria for EUA approval by the FDA. You claim that people cannot sue the FDA for the EUA approval. I would challenge that claim and say people CAN and SHOULD be filing class action lawsuits against the FDA precisely for the fraud they perpetrated against the American people in their improper EUA approval.
Straight from the FDA website (https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization) it says, "Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), when the Secretary of HHS declares that an emergency use authorization is appropriate, FDA may authorize unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when certain criteria are met, INCLUDING THERE ARE NO ADEQUATE, APPROVED, AND AVAILABLE ALTERNATIVES." (Emphasis mine). The language here doesn't even say the alternatives have to be "safe and effective," (which they were) it simply says the alternatives have to be adequate, approved and available.
There were, in fact, not only "adequate" but also effective off label drugs with decades of safety data available to treat the public for COVID 19. These drugs proved quite "available" and were openly employed with great success in other countries. Even in this country these off label use drugs were used by our government to treat immigrants being illegally ushered into our country.
I'd argue that use of medications by our government to treat COVID in immigrant populations signifies "approval."
In short, our government willfully withheld lifesaving medicines from the American citizenry, directly causing a healthcare crisis in our nation along with considerable suffering and death, while providing these "adequate" and "approved" drugs, at the expense of American taxpayers who were denied access to them, to foreigners. And these foreigners were not in receipt of any second class treatment or medical care. The drugs that the FDA deemed "adequate" and "approved" enough for them were also deemed "adequate" and "approved" to treat the then President of the United States.
I'd say the case is very strong that the drugs which were "adequte, approved and available" for an American President and for illegal immigrants - who are presently an elevated and protected class of people in the United States - would also qualify as "adequate, approved and available alternatives" that should have been distributed broadly to the American citizenry, the American public. The moment that there were adequate, approved and available alternatives, which occurred before the fraudulently mislabeled "vaccines" ever rolled out for public distribution, legality of the FDA issued EUA was negated.
Fraud vitiates all contracts. The FDA and all the others mentioned in this publication engaged in deliberate and willful fraud including the fraudulent approval of EUA for the COVID injections. People should not be discouraged from filing and then winning class action lawsuits against the FDA both for approving EUA in the first place and for the fraud that continues each day they have kept the EUA in place.
Let the lawsuits begin.
8% of human DNA is viral in origin and some of the proteins that they code for are beneficial to human existence. Vaccines may be negatively impacting our overall place in the universe. Not to mention, they may be contributing to the inheritance of non-beneficial genes which simply leads to more medical interventions in the future. Nature’s “survival of the fittest” already has the public’s health, at the expense of the individual, naturally built into the system of evolution.