Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Data Humanist's avatar

And the WHO's own data shows that Sweden and Japan, two nations WITHOUT vaccine mandates, significantly did better in terms of All-Cause mortality outcomes (lower!) than the nations which Bill Gates and the WHO would model their pandemic policies after. But even nations that were more restrictive than Sweden but far less than the USA, China, and Australia, still out-performed the USA-Fauci-Gates model by a considerable margin: Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Ireland, to start.

So why would the public health officials in these nations want to surrender their sovereignty? Obviously, NOT in the best interests of their citizens.

I expect we will see some push back on this from some nations in Europe, and from Japan, Singapore, and South Korea, to start. It would be insanity to follow the WHO-Gates lead. Gates might have bought WHO -- but he hasn't bought Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway, Japan, etc.

We'll see. But yes, the proposal is ridiculously bad.

If Gates had wanted to fight Covid and believed that the vaccines were key, he could have Open-Sourced one of the vaccines. The Gates Foundation has that kind of money. Instead, he refused to do exactly that: in fact, the vaccines were profitable to his "philanthropy." It seems this was always about power for him, and never about better public health outcomes.

Expand full comment
NCmom's avatar

I miss mean tweets (helps I’ve never been on Twitter)........ and fed babies, lower emissions, affordable food, thriving startups, affordable gas, kids not damaged by 2 years of masks, the federal government not funding insane ideology in schools and paper pusher trainings, international stability, and not fighting Putin in barely proxy wars to the last dead “-------ian”

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts